488
      
      
         The Great Controversy
      
      
        to condemn the guilty or justify the obedient. Would we know the
      
      
        result of making void the law of God? The experiment has been tried.
      
      
        Terrible were the scenes enacted in France when atheism became the
      
      
        controlling power. It was then demonstrated to the world that to throw
      
      
        off the restraints which God has imposed is to accept the rule of the
      
      
        cruelest of tyrants. When the standard of righteousness is set aside, the
      
      
        way is open for the prince of evil to establish his power in the earth.
      
      
        Wherever the divine precepts are rejected, sin ceases to appear
      
      
        sinful or righteousness desirable. Those who refuse to submit to the
      
      
        government of God are wholly unfitted to govern themselves. Through
      
      
        their pernicious teachings the spirit of insubordination is implanted in
      
      
        the hearts of children and youth, who are naturally impatient of control;
      
      
        and a lawless, licentious state of society results. While scoffing at the
      
      
        credulity of those who obey the requirements of God, the multitudes
      
      
         [585]
      
      
        eagerly accept the delusions of Satan. They give the rein to lust and
      
      
        practice the sins which have called down judgments upon the heathen.
      
      
        Those who teach the people to regard lightly the commandments of
      
      
        God sow disobedience to reap disobedience. Let the restraint imposed
      
      
        by the divine law be wholly cast aside, and human laws would soon
      
      
        be disregarded. Because God forbids dishonest practices, coveting,
      
      
        lying, and defrauding, men are ready to trample upon His statutes as
      
      
        a hindrance to their worldly prosperity; but the results of banishing
      
      
        these precepts would be such as they do not anticipate. If the law
      
      
        were not binding, why should any fear to transgress? Property would
      
      
        no longer be safe. Men would obtain their neighbor’s possessions by
      
      
        violence, and the strongest would become richest. Life itself would
      
      
        not be respected. The marriage vow would no longer stand as a sacred
      
      
        bulwark to protect the family. He who had the power, would, if he
      
      
        desired, take his neighbor’s wife by violence. The fifth commandment
      
      
        would be set aside with the fourth. Children would not shrink from
      
      
        taking the life of their parents if by so doing they could obtain the
      
      
        desire of their corrupt hearts. The civilized world would become a
      
      
        horde of robbers and assassins; and peace, rest, and happiness would
      
      
        be banished from the earth.
      
      
        Already the doctrine that men are released from obedience to God’s
      
      
        requirements has weakened the force of moral obligation and opened
      
      
        the floodgates of iniquity upon the world. Lawlessness, dissipation,
      
      
        and corruption are sweeping in upon us like an overwhelming tide. In