Regularity in Eating
      
      
         139
      
      
        None to Be Forced to Discard Their Third Meal
      
      
        277. With regard to the diet question, this matter must be handled
      
      
        with such wisdom that no overbearing will appear. It should be shown
      
      
        that to eat two meals is far better for the health than to eat three. But
      
      
        there must be no authoritative forcing seen. No one connected with
      
      
        the sanitarium should be compelled to adopt the two-meal system.
      
      
        Persuasion is more appropriate than force....
      
      
        The days are now growing shorter, and it will be a good time to
      
      
        present this matter. As the days shorten, let dinner be a little later, and
      
      
        then the third meal will not be felt necessary.—
      
      
        Letter 145, 1901
      
      
         [178]
      
      
        278. In regard to the third meal, do not make eating but two meals
      
      
        compulsory. Some do best healthwise when eating three light meals,
      
      
        and when they are restricted to two, they feel the change severely.—
      
      
        Letter 200, 1902
      
      
        [
      
      
        Possibility of Harm through Discarding Third Meal at Our
      
      
        Sanitariums—424
      
      
        ]
      
      
        Not to Be a Test
      
      
        279. I eat only two meals a day. But I do not think that the number
      
      
        of meals should be made a test. If there are those who are better in
      
      
        health when eating three meals, it is their privilege to have three. I
      
      
        choose two meals. For thirty-five years I have practiced the two-meal
      
      
        system.—
      
      
        Letter 30, 1903
      
      
        Objectionable Results of Enforcing the Two-Meal Plan in Training
      
      
        Schools
      
      
        280. The impression is upon many minds that the diet question
      
      
        is being carried to extremes. When students combine physical and
      
      
        mental taxation, so largely as they do at this school (Avondale), the
      
      
        objection to the third meal is to a great extent removed. Then no one
      
      
        needs to feel abused. Those who conscientiously eat only two meals
      
      
        need not change in this at all....
      
      
        The fact that some, teachers and students, have the privilege of
      
      
        eating in their rooms, is not creating a healthful influence. There must
      
      
        be harmonious action in the conducting of meals. If those who only eat
      
      
        two meals have the idea that they must eat enough at the second meal
      
      
        to answer for the third meal also, they will injure their digestive organs.